Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Adolescents - Assessment, Risk Stratification, and Disposition Planning
I. Defining and Differentiating Self-Harming Behaviors
A psychiatrist is called by an emergency room doctor and told there is a girl in Room 8 who was “cutting her thighs.” The girl denies any suicidal thoughts and replied “I don’t know,” when asked why she cut herself. How should the evaluation precede?
A precise clinical understanding of self-harming behaviors is essential for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and appropriate risk management. The nomenclature has evolved significantly from historically pejorative terms to the current, function-based conceptualizations that guide modern psychiatric practice. This section will define Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI), distinguish it from Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRBs), and provide a comparative framework for differential diagnosis.
A. The Clinical Definition of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI)
NSSI is formally defined as the intentional, direct, and deliberate destruction or alteration of one's own body tissue without conscious suicidal intent and for purposes not socially or culturally sanctioned. This definition is built upon several core pillars:
Intentionality: The act is purposeful and self-inflicted, not accidental. The individual intends to cause injury.
Absence of Suicidal Intent: The primary motivation is not to end one's life. While the behavior is dangerous and is a significant risk factor for suicide, the immediate goal is typically to cope with or alter an overwhelming emotional state [or lack of ability to feel emotions]. Indeed, some adolescents report using NSSI as a strategy to avert acting on suicidal urges, conceptualizing it as a morbid form of self-help.
Direct Tissue Damage: The behavior must result in immediate physical harm, such as bleeding, bruising, or pain, which distinguishes it from indirect high risk behaviors that could result in harm like disordered eating, substance abuse, or reckless driving.
Historically, such behaviors were often conflated with suicide attempts and labeled with stigmatizing terms like "self-mutilation". Early psychoanalytic theories, such as those by Menninger, viewed them as a form of "partial suicide". The evolution to terms like "deliberate self-harm" (DSH) and, more precisely, NSSI, reflects a critical paradigm shift in clinical understanding—recognizing the behavior not as an attenuated form of suicide but as a distinct, and generally maladaptive, coping mechanism.
In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), NSSI is included in Section III as a condition for further study, with a proposed diagnosis of "Non-suicidal Self-Injury Disorder" (NSSI-D). The proposed criteria require engagement in NSSI on five or more days within the past year, causing significant distress or functional impairment. The behavior must be performed with the expectation of achieving one of three outcomes: relief from a negative feeling or thought, resolution of an interpersonal difficulty, or induction of a positive feeling state.
It is crucial to exclude several other behaviors from the definition of NSSI:
Stereotypic Self-Injury: These are rhythmic, often high-frequency behaviors (e.g., head-banging, self-hitting) commonly associated with severe developmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder or profound intellectual disability.
Socially Sanctioned Practices: Body modifications such as tattooing or piercing [or most kinds of branding] are not considered NSSI unless they are performed with the specific intent to cause self-harm for coping purposes.
Major Self-Injury without Suicidal Intent: These are rare and extreme acts, such as enucleation (eye removal) or limb amputation, which typically occur in the context of psychosis and are distinct from the more common, repetitive nature of NSSI.
B. Understanding Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRBs)
Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRBs) are a group of repetitive self-grooming actions that result in unintentional physical damage to the body. These behaviors are often characterized as "nervous habits" that the individual finds difficult to control and may perform without full awareness.
The most common BFRBs are classified in the DSM-5-TR under the chapter "Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders". These include:
Trichotillomania (Hair-Pulling Disorder)
Excoriation (Skin-Picking) Disorder
Other BFRBs, such as nail-biting (Onychophagia) and cheek-biting (Morsicatio Buccarum), or excessive scab picking or wound debridement,, can be diagnosed under the category of "Other Specified Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorder".
The clinical presentation of BFRBs is characterized by an intense, often uncontrollable urge preceding the behavior. A key feature is that the act is often performed automatically or in a "trance-like" state, with reduced conscious awareness. Unlike NSSI, BFRBs can be associated with feelings of pleasure, gratification, or satisfaction during the act, although these feelings are typically followed by shame, guilt, and distress over the physical damage and lack of control.
C. A Comparative Analysis: Distinguishing NSSI from BFRBs
Accurate differential diagnosis between NSSI and BFRBs is critical, as the distinction dictates the therapeutic approach. While some behaviors, such as skin picking, can appear identical, the underlying intent, function, and associated affective state are fundamentally different. The primary differentiating factor is not the topography of the behavior but the motivation behind it.
A clinician cannot distinguish severe excoriation disorder from NSSI by skin picking without a thorough functional analysis of the patient's internal experience. This underscores why the diagnostic process must pivot on the question "Why are you doing this?" rather than simply "What are you doing?". The answer to this question has direct implications for treatment: NSSI necessitates interventions targeting emotion regulation and distress tolerance, whereas BFRBs are primarily treated with habit-reversal training and stimulus control.
Both NSSI and BFRBs can be conceptualized as maladaptive self-regulatory behaviors, but they appear to operate at different ends of an affective intensity spectrum. BFRBs are often used to manage lower-level, chronic states like boredom, anxiety, or understimulation, whereas NSSI is typically deployed as an urgent response to acute, overwhelming emotional crises. This suggests that individuals may have broad deficits in self-regulation, and the choice of behavior may depend on the intensity of the emotional trigger. A comprehensive treatment approach, therefore, should aim to build a full toolkit of regulatory skills, from managing boredom constructively to tolerating extreme distress without resorting to self-harm.
II. The Epidemiology of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Youth
NSSI is a significant public health concern, particularly among adolescents and young adults. Epidemiological data reveal alarmingly high prevalence rates, a typical onset in early adolescence, and specific demographic risk factors.
A. Prevalence Rates
Community Samples: The lifetime prevalence of NSSI among adolescents in the general population is estimated to be between 15% and 20%. Some reviews report even wider ranges, from 7.5% to 46.5% in adolescence, depending on the population and methodology. The behavior often begins prior to the teenage years, with a large-scale national study of U.S. preadolescents (ages 9-10) finding a lifetime prevalence of 9.1% (Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study). These extremely high rates suggest that NSSI has become a distressingly common feature of the modern adolescent experience. It should not be viewed as an esoteric behavior confined to severely ill individuals but as a widespread, maladaptive coping strategy that many youths experiment with. This reframes the clinical task from identifying a rare disorder to screening for a common risk behavior, similar to screening for substance use, in settings like pediatric primary care and schools.
Clinical Samples: Rates of NSSI are substantially higher among youth receiving mental health services. In adolescent psychiatric inpatient settings, prevalence rates can reach 60%.
B. Age of Onset and Developmental Trajectories
The typical age of onset for NSSI is during early to mid-adolescence, most commonly between the ages of 12 and 14. Prevalence rates appear to peak around ages 15-16 and subsequently decline for many individuals as they move into late adolescence and young adulthood. This timing coincides with a period of significant neurodevelopmental plasticity, hormonal changes, and escalating social pressures (and social media use), suggesting a critical window for early intervention. While the behavior may be transient for some, adolescents who engage in repetitive NSSI are at high risk for continuing to use other maladaptive coping strategies, such as substance misuse, even after the self-injury ceases. This indicates that the initial period of NSSI represents a crucial developmental juncture; effective intervention can potentially divert an adolescent onto a healthier trajectory.
C. Sociodemographic Correlates
Gender: While NSSI is often stereotyped as a predominantly female behavior, large-scale community-based studies have found similar lifetime rates between males and females. However, significant gender differences exist in the preferred methods of self-injury. Females are more likely to engage in self-cutting, whereas males are more likely to engage in hitting, punching, or burning. In clinical settings, particularly emergency psychiatric services, females tend to be overrepresented, likely because men are far less likely to seek help, and among all NSSI, only a small percent presents to a doctor.
Sexual Orientation: There is a consistent and strong association between non-heterosexual identity and NSSI. Adolescents who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or questioning have significantly higher rates of self-injury. In the preadolescent population, one study found that one in four sexual minority children reported a lifetime history of NSSI, a stark disparity that highlights their profound vulnerability. This is not an isolated statistic but likely reflects the immense psychosocial stress, bullying, discrimination, and identity-related conflict these youths face, for which they may lack adequate coping skills or affirming social support. Prevention and treatment for this population must be culturally competent, affirming, and address these specific environmental stressors.
Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: Some research suggests that NSSI is more common among Caucasian youth compared to non-Caucasian youth. Among preadolescents, factors such as low household income and having unmarried parents have also been associated with an increased risk of NSSI.
III. The Phenomenology of NSSI: Methods, Locations, and Clinical Presentation
Recognizing the physical and behavioral manifestations of NSSI is the first step in assessment and intervention. Clinicians must be familiar with the common methods of injury, the typical body locations targeted, and the associated signs that may indicate an adolescent is engaging in this behavior.
A. Common Modalities of Self-Injury
Most individuals who engage in NSSI report using more than one method over time. The choice of method and location can provide important clinical clues. For example, highly visible injuries on the forearms might be more associated with interpersonal functions, such as communicating distress, while injuries in easily concealed locations like the thighs or stomach may be more linked to private, intrapersonal emotion regulation. Furthermore, the number of methods used is a key risk indicator; using multiple methods is associated with a greater likelihood of a past suicide attempt. A recent study also found that cutting on body areas other than the arms or wrists was associated with an increased risk of future suicide.22
The most frequently reported methods include:
Cutting, Scratching, or Carving: This is likely the most common and widely recognized form of NSSI, often performed with razors, knives, glass, or other sharp objects. It is reported more frequently by females, and discussed extensively on social media.
Hitting, Punching, or Head Banging: These behaviors, intended to cause bruising or pain, are more commonly reported by males and those with autism spectrum disorders.
Burning: This can be done with lighters, matches, cigarettes, or heated objects like knives or paper clips.
Other Methods: A wide range of other behaviors can constitute NSSI, including biting oneself, excessive rubbing of an area to create a burn, piercing the skin with sharp objects, inserting objects under the skin, and interfering with the healing of existing wounds.
B. Anatomical Locations
NSSI can be performed on any part of the body, but the most common locations are those that are both easily accessible to the individual and relatively easy to conceal from others. These include:
Arms (forearms and upper arms)
Legs (particularly thighs)
Abdomen
Chest
C. Associated Signs and Symptoms (Clinical Presentation)
Often the shame and guilt associated with NSSI lead to secrecy and concealment, which presents a barrier to identification. The ABCD study found that over 60% of preadolescents with NSSI had never received psychiatric care, a treatment gap largely explained by these hiding behaviors. This means that parents, educators, and healthcare providers cannot rely on spontaneous disclosure and must maintain a high index of suspicion, learning to recognize the subtle signs.
Physical Signs: The most direct evidence of NSSI includes unexplained or frequent injuries, such as cuts, scratches, burns, or bruises. These may appear in patterns or clusters. The presence of scars should prompt questions of a history of self-injury.
Hiding Behaviors: A hallmark of NSSI is the active effort to hide the injuries. This may manifest as:
Wearing long sleeves, long pants, or wristbands, even in hot weather.
Refusing to participate in activities that require less body coverage, such as swimming or physical education class.
Frequent use of bandages.
Behavioral and Emotional Signs: Other warning signs can include:
Frequent and often implausible reports of "accidental" injury.
Possession of sharp objects (razors, lighters, thumbtacks) without a clear reason.
Difficulties in interpersonal relationships.
Significant emotional and behavioral instability, impulsivity, and rapid mood changes.
Verbal expressions of helplessness, hopelessness, worthlessness, need to be punished, or self-hatred.
IV. The Psychological Landscape of NSSI: Motivations and Functions
Understanding why an adolescent engages in NSSI is the cornerstone of effective intervention. The behavior is not random or meaningless; it serves a powerful psychological function for the individual. While NSSI-D is a proposed diagnosis, in clinical practice, NSSI is most often conceptualized as a transdiagnostic symptom of an underlying disorder characterized by emotion dysregulation, such as borderline personality disorder (in adults), major depression, or PTSD. The core deficit is not the self-injury itself, but the impaired ability to regulate emotions. Treatment must focus on building adaptive skills for emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness—the core components of therapies like Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)—rather than simply demanding cessation of the behavior.
A. The Four-Function Model: A Framework for Understanding Motivation
One useful framework for understanding the motivations behind NSSI is the Four-Function Model, which posits that the behavior is maintained by four distinct reinforcement processes. These functions are categorized along two dimensions: intrapersonal (automatic) versus interpersonal (social), and positive reinforcement (adding a desired state) versus negative reinforcement (removing an aversive state).
B. Core Motivations: A Deeper Dive
Within this framework, several core motivations consistently emerge in clinical and research settings:
Emotion Regulation: This is likely the most powerful and frequently cited driver of NSSI. For individuals who lack healthy skills to manage, express, or tolerate intense emotional pain, NSSI becomes a potent coping strategy. The physical pain serves to distract from, punish, or temporarily reduce overwhelming emotional distress. This effect may be mediated neurobiologically through the release of endogenous opioids, which can produce a transient sense of calm, and by the overlap in the brain's neural circuitry for processing physical and emotional pain.
Self-Punishment: For adolescents struggling with intense self-criticism, self-loathing, or guilt, NSSI can function as a means of inflicting a punishment they feel they deserve. This motivation is often linked to a deeply ingrained negative self-concept and the belief that one is "bad" or "defective". This reveals a profound cognitive distortion at the heart of some NSSI, where inflicting pain feels congruent with one's sense of self-worth. For these individuals, NSSI is not just about affect regulation but also about identity confirmation, highlighting the need for cognitive interventions aimed at restructuring these core negative self-beliefs.
Anti-Dissociation: For individuals with a history of trauma, overwhelming distress can trigger dissociative states—a feeling of being numb, unreal, or detached from one's body or emotions. The sharp, grounding sensation of physical pain from NSSI can serve to abruptly end this frightening experience and restore a sense of being "real" and present.
Communication and Interpersonal Influence: When an adolescent lacks the vocabulary or interpersonal skills to articulate their internal suffering, or feels their distress is invisible to others, NSSI can become a powerful, non-verbal signal that something is profoundly wrong. This should not be dismissed as pejorative "attention-seeking," but rather understood as an attempt to communicate and elicit care when other methods have failed.
C. Comorbid Psychiatric Conditions and Risk Factors
NSSI is a transdiagnostic behavior that is strongly associated with a range of psychiatric conditions, including:
Mood Disorders (Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder)
Anxiety Disorders
Borderline Personality Disorder (for which NSSI is a diagnostic criterion)
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and a history of trauma, abuse, or neglect
Eating Disorders
Substance Use Disorders
Other significant risk factors include poor coping and problem-solving skills, high levels of self-criticism, social isolation, and exposure to peers who self-injure (a phenomenon known as social contagion).
V. NSSI and Suicide Risk
The most urgent clinical concern associated with NSSI is its strong, predictive relationship with suicide. It is imperative for clinicians to understand both the crucial distinctions between these behaviors and the dangerous pathway that can lead from one to the other.
A. Differentiating Intent: Coping vs. Cessation of Life
The fundamental difference between NSSI and a suicide attempt lies in the individual's intent.
The primary goal of NSSI is to cope with suffering and regulate overwhelming feelings—in essence, to feel better or to feel something other than emotional agony.
The primary goal of a suicide attempt is to end suffering permanently and cease all feeling permanently.
This difference in intent is typically reflected in other key features:
Method: NSSI methods (e.g., cutting, scratching, burning) are usually of low to moderate medical lethality, whereas methods chosen for suicide attempts (e.g., firearms, hanging, significant overdose) are often more lethal; though for young children of those with low IQ, they may have made an attempt that they thought would be lethal, but an adolescent or adult may know better.
Frequency: NSSI is often a repetitive or chronic behavior used intermittently to manage stress, while suicide attempts are much rarer events.
Psychological State: The level of psychological pain, hopelessness, and cognitive constriction (rigid, black-and-white thinking) is typically more severe and acute immediately preceding a suicide attempt compared to an episode of NSSI.
B. NSSI as a Major Predictor of Suicidal Ideation and Attempts
Despite being definitionally non-suicidal, a history of NSSI is a robust predictor of future suicide attempts. The statistical link has been demonstrated in longitudinal studies, which show that NSSI predicts the later emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The strength of this prediction is at least as strong as the prediction from suicidal thoughts to later suicidal behaviors, though all suicide predition factors share poor predictive power overall. A substantial proportion of adolescents in the inpatient setting who have engaged in NSSI also have a history of suicide attempts, as high as 70%. In clinical populations, it is estimated that a large majority of youth who self-injure will experience suicidality at some point.
C. Theoretical Models Explaining the Link
The leading model explaining how NSSI increases suicide risk is the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide originally developed by Thomas Joiner. This theory posits that a lethal suicide attempt requires two components: the desire for suicide (driven by feelings of being a burden or a lack of belonging) and the acquired capability to carry it out. Humans have a powerful, innate instinct for self-preservation and an aversion to pain and death. NSSI functions as a form of "practice" that systematically erodes this instinct. With each episode of self-injury, the individual becomes more habituated to pain, the sight of blood, and the act of harming their own body. This process of desensitization lowers the psychological and physiological barrier to inflicting more severe, potentially lethal harm, thereby increasing the acquired capability for suicide. This transforms the clinical understanding of NSSI from a static risk factor into an active process of desensitization that paves the way for a future suicide attempt. This model would describe NSSI as "suicide practice," which elevates the urgency of treatment beyond alleviating current distress to preventing future death.
However, as mentioned before, all of the predictors of suicide we have developed do a poor job of predicting who will complete a suicide and most completed suicided do not involve a history of “practicing” with NSSI.
D. Identifying High-Risk Subgroups: Factors that Amplify Suicide Risk
Given that NSSI is a powerful predictor of suicide attempts independent of self-reported suicidal ideation, a standard risk assessment that only asks "Are you feeling suicidal?" is insufficient. A comprehensive risk assessment for a patient with NSSI must include a detailed inquiry into the characteristics of the NSSI itself, as these behavioral variables are potent indicators of acquired capability and must be weighed as heavily as suicidal ideation.
Factors that indicate a higher risk of transitioning from NSSI to a suicide attempt include:
High Frequency and Severity of NSSI: A history of more than 20 lifetime incidents, the use of multiple methods, and the use of more medically severe methods (e.g., deep cutting, severe burning) are all associated with higher suicide risk.
Psychiatric Comorbidity: The presence of co-occurring Major Depressive Disorder or PTSD significantly increases risk.
Psychological Factors: High levels of hopelessness, impulsivity, self-hatred, and concurrent substance use are strong warning signs.
History of Trauma: A history of emotional or sexual abuse is a significant risk factor.
Family Context: High levels of family conflict and a poor parent-child relationship increase risk. Conversely, a strong feeling of connectedness to parents is a powerful protective factor against suicide.
It is also important to note that when assessing children and adolescents, they may not have good words for how they feel or understand why they feel a certain way, so collateral is critical. What is obvious is that the NSSI is telling us there is something else going on.
VI. Clinical Application: A Consult-Liaison Psychiatry Perspective on the Emergency Department Evaluation and Disposition of a 12-Year-Old with NSSI
This section synthesizes the preceding information into a practical framework for the emergency department (ED) management of a 12-year-old female patient presenting after her mother discovered she has been cutting her arms and thighs. The perspective is that of a consult-liaison psychiatrist, whose role is to provide expert psychiatric assessment, risk stratification, and disposition planning at the interface of medicine and psychiatry.
A. The Initial Encounter: Establishing Rapport and Ensuring Medical Stability
The first priority upon the patient's arrival in the ED is medical evaluation and stabilization. The emergency physician will assess and treat the physical injuries, determining the need for wound care, sutures, or infection prophylaxis. The consulting psychiatrist's role begins concurrently, with an approach that must be calm, empathetic, and non-judgmental to build a therapeutic alliance. Expressing shock, anger, or pity can reinforce the patient's shame and impede honest communication.
It is essential to interview the patient alone for at least a portion of the evaluation. This provides a confidential space to discuss sensitive topics such as the function of the self-injury, suicidal ideation, substance use, and potential abuse or trauma, after clearly explaining the limits of confidentiality (i.e., the need to report information related to acute safety risks).
It is ok and helpful to ask about things other that the NSSI. Finding something in common can help the young person to trust you more and being able to joke with them can help them to feel like they can approach the topic more directly.
B. The Comprehensive Psychiatric Assessment
The psychiatric evaluation in the ED is a focused, hypothesis-driven process designed to understand the context of the NSSI, assess for comorbid conditions, and, most critically, stratify the immediate risk of suicide to determine a safe disposition.
Characterizing the NSSI:
Onset, Frequency, and Duration: "When did this start?" "How often does it happen?" "How long do the urges last?"
Methods and Medical Severity: "What do you use to hurt yourself?" "Have your injuries ever needed stitches or gotten infected?"
Triggers and Context: "What is usually happening in the hour or so before you feel the urge to hurt yourself?" "Where are you, and who are you with?"
Function: "What does it do for you?" "What are you feeling right before you do it?" "How do you feel during and right after?"
This line of questioning directly assesses the Four-Function Model and is crucial for understanding the behavior's reinforcing properties. Being curious also helps your patient to talk about it.
Conducting a Thorough Suicide Risk Assessment (SRA): This is a distinct but overlapping component of the evaluation. Best practice involves using a structured instrument, such as the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), in addition to a clinical interview.
Suicidal Ideation: Begin with normalizing questions and proceed to direct inquiry. "Sometimes when people feel as overwhelmed as you do, they have thoughts of ending their life. Have you had any thoughts like that?" Explore the frequency, intensity, and duration of these thoughts.
Suicidal Plan: "Have you thought about how you would do it?" Elicit details about the specific method, timing, and location. Assess the perceived lethality of the plan.
Suicidal Intent: "How much do you want to die?" "Have you started to get things ready or done anything to prepare?" Inquire about preparatory behaviors like writing a suicide note, giving away possessions, or researching methods.
Access to Means: A critical and non-negotiable part of the SRA. "Are there any guns in your home?" "Where are medications kept?" This information is vital for immediate safety planning.
Assessing the Psychosocial Context:
Family System: Interview the parents/guardians to briefly assess family dynamics, current stressors, and especially the parent’s capacity to provide a safe and supportive environment. Inquire about family history of mental illness, substance use, and suicide. The family's ability to contain the child and adhere to treatment is a key factor in the disposition decision.
School and Peers: Ask about academic functioning, bullying, and peer relationships. Inquire if any friends also engage in NSSI, as social contagion is a known risk factor.
Problematic media use: Ask if the patient has a cell phone, what role it plays in their life, whether they are on social media. Assess for signs of addictive behaviors including not being able to be without their phone, feeling withdrawal when they cannot use their phone, lying about their phone use, sneaking around to get their phone, or even obtaining a second phone the parents do not know about.
Trauma History: Screen for a history of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, neglect, or other traumatic events.
Evaluating Protective Factors: Actively identify strengths that mitigate risk, such as a strong connection to a parent, engagement in hobbies or sports, hope for the future, and a willingness to engage in treatment.
C. The Disposition Decision-Making Framework
The fundamental principle guiding disposition, endorsed by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), is to treat the child in the least restrictive setting that can safely and effectively meet their clinical needs. This decision is a complex clinical judgment based on the synthesis of all assessment data. Standardized decision-support tools, such as the Child and Adolescent Level of Care/Service Intensity Utilization System (CALOCUS-CASII), can help structure this process by systematically assessing needs across six key dimensions: Risk of Harm, Functional Status, Co-occurring Conditions, Recovery Environment, Resilience, and Engagement. This tool, however, requires payment and training in order to use.
The following table outlines generally accepted criteria for determining the appropriate level of care for an adolescent with NSSI.
D. Case Analysis: Determining the Appropriate Level of Care for the 12-Year-Old Patient
Applying this framework to the clinical vignette, the disposition decision hinges on the specific findings of the comprehensive assessment. The following scenarios illustrate this clinical reasoning process.
Scenario 1: Justification for Inpatient Admission. During the private interview, the 12-year-old patient discloses that she has been thinking about killing herself for the past week. She has a specific plan to overdose on her mother's Tylenol and has been waiting for an opportunity when she is home alone. She wrote a suicide note, which she hid in her room. She expresses profound hopelessness and states she regrets telling her mother "because now I can't do it." Collateral information from the parents reveals a chaotic home environment with high marital conflict and recent financial stressors.
Disposition: Acute inpatient psychiatric hospitalization is medically necessary. The patient presents with multiple high-risk factors for imminent suicide, including a specific plan, intent, preparatory behaviors (writing a note), and hopelessness. The chaotic and unsupportive home environment is unable to ensure safety. The primary goal of admission is crisis stabilization and suicide prevention in a secure, 24-hour supervised setting.
Scenario 2: Justification for Partial Hospitalization (PHP) or Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP). The patient tearfully and credibly denies current suicidal ideation, but has though about not wanting to be alive in the past. She states the cutting is the only way she knows how "to let the pressure out" when she feels overwhelmed by anxiety about school and fights with her parents. The behavior has escalated to nearly daily, and she has missed the last three days of school because she feels too ashamed and overwhelmed to go. The parents are visibly distressed but also loving, highly motivated to help, and capable of providing supervision and support at home.
Disposition: The patient does not meet the criteria for inpatient admission due to the absence of acute suicidality. However, the high frequency of NSSI and significant functional impairment (school refusal) indicate that weekly outpatient therapy is likely insufficient. A step-up in care is reasonable. PHP would be an appropriate recommendation, providing intensive, structured, daily therapeutic programming to build coping skills and address family dynamics, while allowing the patient to return home to a supportive environment each evening. If PHP is unavailable or the impairment is less severe, a multi-day IOP would be the next best option.
Scenario 3: Justification for Discharge with Urgent Outpatient Follow-up. The assessment reveals that this was the patient's first time self-injuring. The cuts are superficial scratches made with a paperclip. The act was impulsive, following a distressing social media incident with a peer. The patient expresses significant remorse, denies any suicidal ideation, and is able to engage collaboratively in creating a safety plan, identifying alternative coping strategies (e.g., talking to her parents, listening to music). Her parents are shocked but calm, supportive, and immediately agree to remove sharp objects from her room and commit to arranging therapy.
Disposition: The acute risk is low. The NSSI is of low medical severity and frequency, and there are strong protective factors, including patient insight and robust family support. The most appropriate plan is to discharge the patient home with her parents after completing a thorough safety plan, providing crisis resources (e.g., the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline), and securing an urgent appointment with an outpatient therapist and child psychiatrist within the next 24-48 hours.
E. Safety Planning and Family Intervention in the ED
Regardless of the final disposition, two interventions are mandatory before the patient leaves the ED:
Safety Planning: This is a collaborative process with the patient and family to create a written plan that outlines specific steps to take when urges to self-harm arise. It includes identifying personal warning signs, internal coping strategies (e.g., distraction techniques, self-soothing), people and social settings that can provide distraction, family members or friends to contact for help, and professional resources to call in a crisis.
Means Restriction Counseling: This involves explicitly instructing the family on the critical importance of creating a safe home environment. This is a concrete, evidence-based intervention to prevent both NSSI and suicide. The family must be counseled to remove or securely lock away all potential means of self-harm and suicide, including razors, knives, scissors, ropes, belts, and all medications (both prescription and over-the-counter).
Psychoeducation: The family should be educated that NSSI is a symptom of underlying emotional pain, not a form of manipulation. They should be encouraged to adopt a non-judgmental, curious stance and to foster open communication with their child.
VII. Conclusion
A. Summary of Key Clinical Imperatives
Non-suicidal self-injury is a complex and prevalent phenomenon in adolescence that demands a nuanced and evidence-based clinical response. Several key imperatives emerge from this review. First, assessment must move beyond a simple description of the behavior to a functional analysis of its purpose, with the distinction between NSSI and BFRBs hinging on the individual's intent. Second, NSSI must always be treated as a potent risk factor for suicide. Its presence signifies not only profound current distress but also an "acquired capability" that may make a future suicide attempt more likely. Therefore, risk assessment must include a detailed characterization of the NSSI itself. Third, effective treatment is not merely about stopping the behavior but about building adaptive skills for emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and interpersonal communication. Finally, the family system is central to both the problem and the solution; engaging parents as allies in safety planning and therapy is critical for a successful outcome.
B. Emerging Research and Treatment Modalities
The field continues to advance, with ongoing research into the neurobiology of emotion dysregulation and pain processing in individuals who engage in NSSI. While psychotherapeutic approaches like DBT and CBT have the strongest evidence base, further investigation into their long-term efficacy and comparative outcomes is needed. Pharmacological treatments remain limited and are primarily focused on managing comorbid conditions rather than directly targeting NSSI. A significant challenge for future research is the development of interventions tailored to specific, high-risk populations, such as adolescents with co-occurring autism spectrum disorder, eating disorders, or ultra-high-risk states for psychosis. By integrating biological, psychological, and social perspectives, clinicians and researchers can continue to refine their understanding and improve outcomes for the many adolescents affected by this distressing behavior.
Resources
Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: What We Know, and What We Need to Know - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4244874/
Nonsuicidal Self-injury: A Systematic Review - Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01946/full
Non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a clinician's guide to understanding the phenomenon, diagnostic challenges, and evidence-based treatments - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12339462/
Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Diagnostic Challenges And Current Perspectives - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6959491/
Nonsuicidal Self injury in Adolescents - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2695720/
Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Context, Forms and Functions - Mental Health Academy, https://www.mentalhealthacademy.com.au/blog/non-suicidal-self-injury-context-forms-and-functions
Psychotherapeutic approaches to non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3782878/
Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents - PMC - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7390135/
Motives for Performing Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRBs): Similarities to and Differences from Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious and Stereotypic Movement Behaviors | springermedizin.de, https://www.springermedizin.de/motives-for-performing-body-focused-repetitive-behaviors-bfrbs-s/27335036
Characteristics and functions of non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2538378/
Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRBs) | Anxiety and ..., https://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/co-occurring-disorders/body-focused-repetitive-behaviors
Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: A Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Symptom Features - e-Publications@Marquette, https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1519&context=psych_fac
(PDF) Non-suicidal Self-Injury in Adolescence - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315309854_Non-suicidal_Self-Injury_in_Adolescence
Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Preadolescent Children: Who's at Risk? - MGH Psychiatry News, https://mghpsychnews.org/nonsuicidal-self-injury-in-preadolescents/
Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) Interventions, https://www.selfinjury.bctr.cornell.edu/perch/resources/gonzales.pdf
Clinical Characteristics of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Suicide Attempts among Psychiatric Patients in Korea: A Retrospective Chart Review - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7176559/
Non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a clinician's guide to understanding the phenomenon, diagnostic challenges, and evidence-based treatments - PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40800631/
A new look at self-injury - American Psychological Association, https://www.apa.org/monitor/2015/07-08/self-injury
Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Is Predictive of Suicide Attempts Among Individuals with Mood Disorders - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724372/
Helping youth who self-harm - American Counseling Association, https://www.counseling.org/publications/counseling-today-magazine/article-archive/article/legacy/helping-youth-who-self-harm
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Suicidal Behaviour - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10096207/
APA Practice Guideline - Provides Recommendations for Assessing and Treating Patients With Suicidal Behaviors - PsychDB, https://www.psychdb.com/_media/apa_suicide_risk_assessment.pdf
Non-suicidal self-injury in inpatient and outpatient ... - Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1483745/full
Inpatient and Residential Health Care - AACAP, https://www.aacap.org/aacap/Member_Resources/Practice_Information/Inpatient_and_Residential_Health_Care.aspx
Inpatient Hospital Treatment of Children and Adolescents - AACAP, https://www.aacap.org/aacap/Policy_Statements/1989/Inpatient_Hospital_Treatment_of_Children_and_Adolescents.aspx
CALOCUS-CASII, https://www.calocus-casii.org/
Body-focused repetitive behaviors and non-suicidal self-injury: A ..., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32135390/
Body-focused repetitive behaviors and non-suicidal self-injury: A comparison of clinical characteristics and symptom features - UTMB Research Experts, https://researchexperts.utmb.edu/en/publications/body-focused-repetitive-behaviors-and-non-suicidal-self-injury-a-
1 PRACTICE PARAMETERS CHILD and ADOLESCENT INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT A Publication of the Association of Child and Adolesc, https://www.ispn-psych.org/assets/docs/practiceparameters.pdf
What is Self-Harm? - SAMHSA, https://www.samhsa.gov/mental-health/what-is-mental-health/conditions/self-harm
Inpatient Hospital Treatment of Children and Adolescents - AACAP
Author: Dr. T. Ryan O’Leary, MD
The author's may use Ai Large Language Models to assist with the content creation. The content is edited and fact checked by the author based on their expertise. All content should be considered the opinion of the author and not that of any civil or government agency for which they may work or contract. None of the content should be considered personal medical advice and all readers should consult with their physician for personal medical advice.
Comments
Post a Comment
We welcome respectful comments.