Childhood Deficit Disorder and the Atrophy of American Childhood
Over the last 50 years trends in parenting, changes to the physical environment, and a flood of digital media has resulted in a profound “contraction" in the kinds of experiences children enjoy, despite the claims that digital connectedness would do the opposite. The physical range of children has contracted from the neighborhood to the backyard, and finally to the bedroom. The social sphere has contracted from the unsupervised peer group to the adult-mediated playdate and finally the algorithmic social network. The temporal domain of childhood has contracted from hours of free play to a regimented schedule of structured activities interrupted by hours online.
Most Boomers, Gen Xers, and Millennials can tell personal stories marking the trajectory from the "free-range" norms of the 1970s and early 80s to the "intensive parenting" hegemony of the 2020s. Many may not have noticed that public spaces were simultaneously re-engineered to prioritize vehicular traffic over child autonomy, creating a dependency on adult supervision that paved the way for the digital colonization of youth. I explore how childhood has transformed over the past 50 years and then propose a new theoretical construct—Childhood Deficit Disorder (CDD)—to help us think about how systemic failure to provide the essential developmental nutrients of autonomy, risk, and connection can harm our children.
The Transformation of Parenting Culture (1970–2025)
The "Free-Range" of the 1970s
To comprehend the magnitude of the contemporary shift, one must first establish my view of the baseline of the 1970s. Parenting norms of this decade were more than just a little different from the present. A Google N-gram search suggests that the concept of a "parenting style" was not a thing until the 1980s. Prior to this child-rearing was viewed as a natural and instinctual, if chaotic process rather than a professionalized set of competencies. The prevailing ethos, which we might retrospectively term "free-range," was characterized by a distinct lack of adult surveillance. This is why we have all those Steven Spielberg movies like the Goonies.
Children in this era typically left their homes in the morning and operated with a degree of autonomy (and no cell phones) that would be legally actionable in many US jurisdictions today. The physical boundary of childhood was the neighborhood or the town, not the property line. Parents practiced a form of what might be referred to as "benign neglect," trusting that the community—and the children themselves—could manage the ordinary frictions of daily life. The primary parenting guidance of the era, Dr. Benjamin Spock’s work, focused on the pragmatics of physical survival (health, hygiene) rather than the optimization of cognitive and emotional outcomes or the cultivation of a "resume" for the child. I’m not saying this was a perfect or altogether correct approach, but it did foster a sense of self-efficacy and curiosity in children.
The 1970s parent did not view themselves as the child's entertainer or conflict mediator. If children argued on a playground, they were expected to resolve the dispute without adult intervention. Adults who intervened in small child conflicts were considered meddlesome. This lack of intervention was not merely a lack of interest (though for some it probably was); on average, it was a tacit acknowledgement of children's “antifragility”—the idea that they benefit from stressors and challenges. The cultural assumption was that a child’s time was their own, and boredom was a stimulus for creativity rather than a problem to be solved by an adult.
The Economic Engines of "Intensive Parenting"
The shift from 1970s permissiveness to the intensive parenting of the 21st century was not random cultural drift but a rational response to structural economic changes. The diffusion and deepening of intensive parenting norms were accelerated by the rise of economic insecurities that began to manifest in the late 20th century.
Whether real or imagined, the reliance on higher education for economic viability increased, the "stakes" of childhood were raised. In the perceived egalitarian economic landscape of the mid-20th century, a "permissive" or laissez-faire parenting style appeared to carry lower risks; a child could likely achieve a middle-class standard of living without aggressive parental cultivation. However, as safe middle-class jobs shipped to Mexico, China, or the South Pacific the gap between the "haves" and "have-nots" expanded, parents—particularly in the middle and upper-middle classes—began to view childhood not as a time of leisure but as a critical window for human capital accumulation.
This economic anxiety drove the adoption of what some call "intensive mothering," a term coined by sociologist Sharon Hays. This ideology posits that proper child-rearing must be child-centered, expert-guided, emotionally absorbing, labor-intensive, and financially expensive. The child is a "project" to be managed, social capital to be maximized. To be fair to mothers (and fathers) this kind of parenting was not necessarily a choice they were making, but a response to the economy and other social pressures. In economies where education is the primary driver of social mobility, parents may naturally gravitate toward authoritative styles that emphasize "working hard" and maximizing potential, moving away from values of "independence" and "imagination" that characterized the permissive 70s, but which was interrupted from time to time by an authoritarian parent. While children were allowed much more freedom, parents didn’t tend to try to reason with them, but instead to insist that their authority as parents was enough. I’m not trying to say there has been no trade-off, just that relying on reasoning with children about their future is not enough and is likely to backfire dramatically before about the age of 14, fueling more anxiety than clarity of purpose.
The Paradox of Time: The "Busy" Parent
A common excuse for current child rearing is that modern parents, particularly with the rise of dual-income households, spend less time with their children than previous generations. This may be more parents trying to absolve themselves of responsibility than objective truth. Time-use diaries analyzed by the Pew Research Center reveal a massive increase in the volume of time parents dedicate to childcare.
In 1965, fathers spent an average of just 2.5 hours per week on childcare. By 2011, that figure had nearly tripled to 7.3 hours per week. Even more strikingly, mothers—despite entering the workforce in record numbers—increased their childcare time from 10 hours per week in 1965 to 13.5 hours in 2011. This increase was most pronounced among college-educated parents, supporting the theory that this is a class-based strategy of "cultivation."
The problem may be, instead, spending too much time with children, or at least not the right kind of time. The nature of this time shifted fundamentally. In the 1970s, parental presence was often passive (e.g., the parent is in the kitchen while the child plays in the yard). In the intensive parenting era, the time is active and managerial: driving to soccer practice, assisting with homework, mediating playdates, and curating experiences. This shift has come at a significant psychological cost. Of course mothers or fathers who intensively parent are likely to have higher levels of stress, anxiety, and guilt compared to those who do not. The pressure to be constantly responsive has created a dynamic of "parental burnout," where the parent’s self-worth is inextricably tied to the child’s performance. This burnout on the parents part is then reflected onto children, who may feel responsible for not being good enough.
The "Culture of Fear" and Cultivation Theory
It is commonly understood that one psychological driver of the retreat to the home was the media-fueled panic regarding child safety. Beginning in the 1980s with the 24-hour news cycle and high-profile abduction cases (e.g., Adam Walsh), the American consciousness was bombarded with the narrative that public spaces were predatory.
One explanation of this phenomenon is George Gerbner’s Cultivation Theory, which posits that heavy consumers of media develop an exaggerated belief in a "mean and scary world". Despite clear statistical evidence that violent crime against children—including sexual abuse and abduction—declined significantly from the early 1990s onward, parental fear continued to rise. The "availability heuristic"—the ease with which one can recall a terrifying news story—overwhelmed the statistical reality of safety.
"Stranger danger" which psychologists had understood to be a natural condition of late infancy had become the default mode of "good parenting". To be a responsible parent in the 21st century is to be a watchful parent. The "free-range" behaviors of the 1970s were re-coded as negligence. This fear justified the removal of children from the streets and parks, relocating them to the perceived safety of the home and the backseat of the car, thereby stripping them of independent interaction with the world.
It is unclear exactly how over-protective parenting and parental anxiety has defined modern parenting, but few would argue that it hasn’t.
The Erosion of the Physical Realm
The Collapse of Independent Mobility
The most quantifiable metric of the contraction of childhood is the decline in independent mobility, which can most easily be recognized in the commute to school. This daily journey was once the primary venue for unsupervised socialization and physical activity. It is now something that has made other parents gasp when I revealed that we let our son ride his bike to school. “You mean he crosses University Avenue by himself?!”
By 2009, the "parent taxi" had replaced the child pedestrian. One can easily see how this created a feedback loop: parents drive children due to fear of traffic (and strangers), which increases traffic volume around schools, which makes the environment more dangerous for pedestrians, prompting more parents to drive. This collapse in active self-transport accompanies a rise in childhood obesity and the decline in cardiovascular fitness among American youth. Most kids I know think they will become deathly ill if they go out in the rain.
The Hostility of the Built Environment
The physical landscape of the United States has been engineered to be hostile to children and most other living things. The dominance of the automobile in urban planning—evident in the widening of roads, the removal of sidewalks, and the sprawl of suburbs—has severed the connective tissue of neighborhoods as much as it has the wider ecological systems.
The built environment has been a strong predictor of child well-being. For example, youth living on residential blocks dominated by heavy vehicular traffic have 74% greater odds of having lower conduct ratings in schools compared to those on mixed-use, walkable blocks. Ironically, the "cul-de-sac" childhood, while designed for safety, often isolates children if the arteries connecting the cul-de-sacs are too dangerous to traverse. The loss of "transitional spaces"—alleyways, vacant lots, and quiet streets—has removed the venues where unstructured play historically occurred. When the environment is designed primarily for cars, children are rendered dependent on adults for all movement, delaying the development of spatial awareness and navigational skills.
The Extinction of the "Third Place" for Teens
Beyond the street, adolescents have suffered from the systematic elimination of what have been called "third places"—social environments distinct from home (first place) and school (second place). Sociologist Ray Oldenburg defined these as essential for community vitality, yet for modern American youth, they are virtually nonexistent. Phones and gaming consoles have become the third places.
Traditional third places like malls, diners, and parks have become increasingly hostile to adolescents. Curfews, "no loitering" laws, and high-frequency audio devices (of which one is installed at a home near my house) designed to repel teenagers have criminalized the act of "hanging out". Commercial spaces often require purchases that teenagers cannot afford, while public spaces like parks are often designed for small children (playgrounds) or organized sports, leaving no legitimate space for adolescent socialization.
The loss of these spaces contributes to social isolation and drives teens into social media. The vacuum left by the decline of physical gathering spots has been filled by digital spaces, which offer the illusion of connection but lack the physical information and "low stakes" social interactions of the real world. The decline of the third place forces socialization into the private sphere (bedrooms) or the digital sphere, both of which are heavily mediated or monitored (or are not properly monitored… more on that later).
The Criminalization of Play and "Let Grow"
Perhaps the most chilling development in the containment of childhood is the legal and social criminalization of independence. Parents who attempt to raise "free-range" children often face scrutiny from the state. High-profile cases of parents being investigated by Child Protective Services (CPS) for allowing children to walk to the park or play outside unsupervised have sent a chilling effect through the culture.
This "surveillance parenting" is enforced not just by the state but by other citizens who, conditioned by media narratives, view an unaccompanied child as a victim in waiting. In response, the Let Grow movement has emerged, advocating for "Reasonable Childhood Independence" laws. These statutes, passed in states like Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, and Colorado, clarify that allowing a child to engage in independent activities does not constitute neglect. This legislative pushback highlights the extent to which the state has encroached on the fundamental right of children to exist in public with adult supervision.
Nature Deficit Disorder
Richard Louv’s concept of "Nature Deficit Disorder" (NDD) shows how some thinkers attempt to bridge the physical environment and mental health. Louv argues that the behavioral problems observed in modern children—including attention difficulties and sensory dysregulation—are often a rational response to an unnatural environment. Among other things, he argues the human child evolved to move through complex natural landscapes, not to sit sedentary in climate-controlled rooms.
Some research supports this hypothesis, suggesting that exposure to green space and unstructured outdoor play can significantly reduce hyperactivity and distractibility and improve cognitive functioning. Given the extremely diverse definitions of what constitutes natural, I’m not a huge fan of appeals to nature, but what is obvious is that outdoor activities have far more benefits than time spent in front of screens.
The Digital Colonization of Childhood
The "Great Rewiring" Thesis
Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt identifies the period between 2010 and 2015 as a critical inflection point, creating what he terms "The Anxious Generation." This era marked the transition from a "play-based childhood" to a "phone-based childhood".
The introduction of the smartphone (iPhone in 2007) and the subsequent ubiquity of social media apps (Instagram in 2010) fundamentally altered the developmental landscape. Haidt argues that this "Great Rewiring" correlates precisely with a meteoric rise in rates of adolescent anxiety, depression, and self-harm across the English-speaking world.
The mechanism of this harm is multifaceted:
Social Deprivation: Screen time displaces face-to-face interaction, which is essential for reading social cues and developing empathy.
Sleep Deprivation: The presence of devices in the bedroom erodes sleep quality and duration, a critical factor in mental health.
Attention Fragmentation: Constant notifications prevent the deep focus required for complex cognitive tasks and emotional regulation.
Addiction: The variable reward schedules of social media apps are designed to hijack the dopaminergic system, creating dependency.
The Digital Panopticon: Surveillance Parenting
Digital technology has armed the anxious parent with unprecedented tools for surveillance. The protective instinct of the physical world has migrated to the digital realm via tracking apps (e.g., Life360). Survey data suggests that 80% of parents track their children’s location, and 54% monitor their text messages. I can track my child’s location as well, though I try hard to resist doing it. We track him no because I fear he will be kidnapped, but because he has severe ADHD and often “get’s lost” in time and we need to know where he is so we can pick him up. I fully admit to having succumbed to the need to know where my child is.
While motivated by safety, this constant digital tether may prevent the experience of true psychological autonomy. Children know they are being watched, which inhibits the necessary developmental process of separating from parents and testing boundaries. However, I am not sure that this is one of the most contributory issues. Children always knew that other parents could tell on them. What concerns me more is that, while parents are hyper-vigilant about location, paradoxically most of us are less effective at managing the content risks of the internet. We are terrified of what may happen on the playground or in the street, but the real danger is in unrestricted internet activity. This represents a misalignment of protective resources: over-protection in the real world and under-protection in the virtual world.
The Paradox of Connection: Isolation in a Networked World
The impact of digital media on social connection is a subject of intense debate. Some ascribe to the "displacement hypothesis" (internet replaces real interaction) versus the "stimulation hypothesis" (internet enhances connection). Current evidence suggests some far more nuanced. There is a "rich get richer" dynamic: for socially competent youth, social media can augment friendship, but for lonely, anxious youth, it can exacerbate isolation. This means that getting kids online before they have otherwise become socially competent may harm them more than help them.
While teenagers report that social media helps them feel "connected,” this connection is often performative. The lack of "embodiment"—physical touch, eye contact, and synchronous non-verbal communication—means that digital interaction likely does not trigger the same biological release of stress regulatory hormones, like oxytocin. Consequently, we see a generation that is hyper-connected yet reports historically high levels of loneliness. Ironically, we are often asking kids who do not know how to connect offline whether online or offline connections are better. They often don’t have the experience to know the difference.
Australia just banned social media for kids under 16, and many of them are making statements like, “I won’t be able to chat with my friends anymore without social media.” It is as if they have no concept of any other way to communicate.
Defining Childhood Deficit Disorder (CDD)
Instead of Nature Deficit Disorder, what I think kids are struggling with the most is something more specific: Childhood Deficit Disorder (CDD). Unlike traditional disorders located within the child's biology, CDD is a disorder of the environment and culture surrounding the child. It frames the mental health crisis not as a malfunction of the individual, but as a physiological and psychological response to systemic deprivation.
I can hear Allen Frances grunting right now. Allen was in charge of the DSM IV task force, and this experience among others convinced him that psychiatry as a whole over-pathologizes normal human behavior and there is no shortage of psychiatrists trying to get their own diagnosis into the DSM. If you are listening, Allen, I want to reassure you that I do not want this diagnosis in the DSM. This is a mental exercise. It is meant to help people understand what is happening to our youth, not to add to the deluge of proposed diagnostic criteria.
Imagined Diagnostic Criteria
Childhood Deficit Disorder (CDD) is a developmental condition caused by the chronic and systemic deprivation of autonomous social play, independent mobility, risk-taking, and connection to the physical world. It is characterized by the atrophy of emotional resilience, social competence, and self-efficacy due to severe environmental restrictions and increasing digital displacement.
A diagnosis of CDD assesses the child’s ecosystem and their reactions to it. The presence of three or more Environmental Criteria leading to two or more Functional Impairments constitutes CDD.
A. Environmental Criteria (The Causes)
Play Deprivation: The child engages in less than one hour of unsupervised, unstructured, non-digital play per day.
Mobility Restriction: The child is unable or not permitted to travel independently to any location (school, park, friend’s house) within a walkable radius appropriate for their age (e.g., 1 mile by age 10).
Surveillance Saturation: The child is subject to constant monitoring via digital tracking or adult presence during waking hours, eliminating the experience of privacy or solitude.
Digital Displacement: Screen media usage exceeds 4 hours per day during school days and 6 hours per day on average during weekends or school breaks.
B. Functional Impairments (The Effects)
External Locus of Control: A persistent belief that problems cannot be solved without adult intervention or an insistence that adults be included most or all of the time in order to adjudicate conflicts with peers.
Risk Aversion & Fragility: Extreme anxiety regarding minor physical risks (climbing, running, crossing the road) or social risks (disagreements, minor criticisms, playing where adults cannot be seen), leading to avoidance behavior.
Social Atrophy: Inability to resolve peer conflicts without arbitration by an authority figure; reliance on digital mediation for communication.
Sensory Dysregulation: Difficulty managing physical arousal or attention in non-digital environments (e.g., fidgeting, inability to sit still without a device).
C. Exclusion
The symptoms are not otherwise better explained by any other disorder including but not limited to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or anxiety disorders such as social anxiety disorder or separation anxiety.
D. As a Modifier
The modifier with significant childhood deficit can be given to any other diagnosable disorder which supersedes CDD, but which meets at least 2 or more of the environmental criteria and is likely to have added additional burden or worsened the severity of symptoms of that disorder.
Theoretical Justification
The construct of CDD synthesizes Peter Gray’s work on the "Play Deficit," Richard Louv’s "Nature Deficit Disorder," and Jonathan Haidt’s "Anxious Generation" thesis. It posits that the human organism has specific evolutionary requirements for development—autonomy, risk, and community—that the modern American environment no longer provides.
Counter-Currents and Future Trajectories
The "Let Grow" Renaissance
In resistance to these trends, a counter-movement is gaining legislative and cultural ground. Organizations like Let Grow have successfully lobbied for "Reasonable Childhood Independence" laws in states including Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, and Colorado. These laws narrow the definition of neglect, protecting parents who allow their children to walk to school or play outside from state prosecution. This legislative success suggests a growing societal recognition that "safetyism" has become detrimental.
The Push for Phone-Free Spaces
Simultaneously, the movement for phone-free schools is accelerating. Recognizing the "attention fragmentation" caused by devices, schools and districts are increasingly implementing bans on smartphone use during the school day to force social interaction and restore cognitive focus. Proposals like the one passed in Australia to raise the age of "internet adulthood" to 16 are also being debated to protect the vulnerable window of puberty from algorithmic pressure. Although we don’t know what exactly the correct age is, we do know that the laissez faire attitude previously adopted is harmful. A little over-correction may help us better estimate the most reasonable age restrictions.
Conclusion: The Fork in the Road
The last half-century of childhood in the United States represents a profound experiment in increasing control and restriction. By removing risk, the freedom to fail, and natural consequences of interactions with the physical world from children's lives, we have not made them safer; we have converted them from anti-fragile to fragile, from resilient to reliant. The rise of intensive parenting and the retreat into the digital sphere have created a generation that is protected from physical harm but exposed to unprecedented psychological risk.
The definition of Childhood Deficit Disorder is not a real diagnostic category but a warning. The cure for the current crisis lies not in more medication or more surveillance, but in a courageous return to the fundamental elements of human growth: trust, play, and the freedom to explore the world.
Suggested Resources
5 Present-Day Parenting Styles Inadvertently Favored in the 1970s, https://www.parent.com/blogs/conversations/2023-5-present-day-parenting-styles-inadvertently-favored-in-the-1970s
The Anxious Generation - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Anxious_Generation
Parenthood and Well-Being: A Decade in Review - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7326370/
The economic incentives for pushy parenting, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2014/10/authoritarian-permissive-parenting-style-economics/
Full article: In the best interests of children? The paradox of intensive parenting and children's health - Taylor & Francis Online, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09581596.2019.1690632
Chapter 4: How Mothers and Fathers Spend Their Time | Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/chapter-4-how-mothers-and-fathers-spend-their-time/
Family structure and trends in US fathers' time with children, 2003–2013 - PMC - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4858712/
Today's parents spend more time with their kids than moms and dads did 50 years ago, https://news.uci.edu/2016/09/28/todays-parents-spend-more-time-with-their-kids-than-moms-and-dads-did-50-years-ago/
Cultivation Theory - of George Gerbner - SweetStudy, https://www.sweetstudy.com/sites/default/files/q2/23/04/griffin_ch_27_cultivation.pdf
The Cultivation of Parent and Child Materialism: A Parent–Child Dyadic Study - PMC - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8252968/
Trends In Child Victimization | Crimes against Children Research Center - University of New Hampshire, https://www.unh.edu/ccrc/trends-child-victimization
What the data says about crime in the U.S. - Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/04/24/what-the-data-says-about-crime-in-the-us/
Parental Understandings of 'Stranger Danger' - Access Manager - University of Portsmouth, https://pure.port.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/111015085/Parental_understandings_of_stranger_danger_.pdf
U.S. School Travel, 2009 - Noreen McDonald, https://mcdonald.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8583/2014/12/McDonald_etal_SchoolTravel2009NHTS_AJPM2011.pdf
U.S. School Travel, 2009 An Assessment of Trends | Request PDF - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51500830_US_School_Travel_2009_An_Assessment_of_Trends
Walking to School: Trends, Issues and Evidence Trends in school travel, https://walkbiketoschool.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Walking-to-school-research-1.pdf
Why So Few Walk or Bike to School | Transportation Nation - WNYC, https://www.wnyc.org/story/284604-why-so-few-walk-or-bike-to-school/
The Impact of the Built Environment on Children's School Conduct Grades: The Role of Diversity of Use in a Hispanic Neighborhood - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3835623/
(PDF) Children's Play in their Local Neighborhoods: Rediscovering the Value of Residential Streets - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311396595_Children's_Play_in_their_Local_Neighborhoods_Rediscovering_the_Value_of_Residential_Streets
Relationship between Children's Independent Activities and the Built Environment of Outdoor Activity Space in Residential Neighborhoods: A Case Study of Nanjing - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9408766/
America's Third Places Are Disappearing and Why It Matters | American Enterprise Institute, https://www.aei.org/society-and-culture/americas-third-places-are-disappearing-and-why-it-matters/
The disappearance of third spaces: a crisis for human connection - The LeSabre, https://thelesabre.com/96100/showcase/the-disappearance-of-third-spaces-a-crisis-for-human-connection/
Lost in Transition: The Health Impact of the Loss of Public Spaces for Teens - Blue Zones, https://www.bluezones.com/2025/08/lost-in-transition-the-health-impact-of-the-loss-of-public-spaces-for-teens/
Closure of 'Third Places'? Exploring Potential Consequences for Collective Health and Wellbeing - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6934089/
Judiciary Committee; AN ACT LIMITING A FINDING OF NEGLECT OR RISK OF INJURY TO A CHILD IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. - C G A, https://www.cga.ct.gov/2023/JFR/S/PDF/2023SB-01133-R00JUD-JFR.PDF
EXPERT TESTIMONY - Let Grow, https://letgrow.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Testimony-in-Favor-of-Reasonable-Childhood-Independence-Laws-1.pdf
Let Grow - When Adults Step Back, Kids Step Up., https://letgrow.org/
GIVING THE GIFT OF INDEPENDENCE - Let Grow, https://letgrow.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Let-Grow-Annual-Report_2025.pdf
Nature deficit disorder - Grokipedia, https://grokipedia.com/page/Nature_deficit_disorder
Addressing “Nature-Deficit Disorder”: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of Young Adults Attending a Wilderness Camp - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4695668/
How to Protect Kids from Nature-Deficit Disorder - Greater Good Science Center, https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_to_protect_kids_from_nature_deficit_disorder
About - The Anxious Generation, https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/about
Books: The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness: Gen Z and the meteoric rise in anxiety, depression, and self-harm - PMC - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11221737/
Spying on Your Kids: 80% of Parents Track Their Children's Locations and Online Activities [Survey] | All About Cookies, https://allaboutcookies.org/how-many-parents-track-their-children
Safety and Surveillance Software Practices as a Parent in the Digital World, https://digitalwellnesslab.org/research-briefs/safety-and-surveillance-software-practices-as-a-parent-in-the-digital-world/
Belonging and loneliness in cyberspace: impacts of social media on adolescents' well-being, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00049530.2021.1898914
A Comparison of Offline and Online Friendship Qualities at Different Stages of Relationship Development - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249718976_A_Comparison_of_Offline_and_Online_Friendship_Qualities_at_Different_Stages_of_Relationship_Development
Chapter 4: Social Media and Friendships - Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/08/06/chapter-4-social-media-and-friendships/
Social Media and Youth Mental Health: The US Surgeon General's Advisory - HHS.gov, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/sg-youth-mental-health-social-media-advisory.pdf
The Decline of Play and the Rise of Psychopathology in Children and Adolescents • - ERIC, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ985541.pdf
The Decline of Play and Rise in Children's Mental Disorders | Psychology Today, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-learn/201001/the-decline-play-and-rise-in-childrens-mental-disorders
Improving Mental Health Through Independent Play | Harvard Graduate School of Education, https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/edcast/24/02/improving-mental-health-through-independent-play
Chapter: 3 Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Effects, https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/26809/chapter/5
Pandemic Hurt Children's Social Skills, Mental Health Most - Gallup News, https://news.gallup.com/poll/658100/pandemic-hurt-children-social-skills-mental-health.aspx
Five-year trends in U. S. child and adolescent 24-hour movement behavior guideline adherence, 2018–2022 - NIH,https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12532870/
By: T. Ryan O’Leary, MD
The author(s) may use Ai Large Language Models to assist with the content creation. The content is edited and fact checked by the author based on their expertise. All content should be considered the opinion of the author and not that of any civil or government agency for which they may work or contract. None of the content should be considered personal medical advice and all readers should consult with their physician for personal medical advice.
Comments
Post a Comment
We welcome respectful comments.